Last updated
Was this helpful?
Fiber optic connectors are the backbone of high-speed data transmission, but choosing the right interface—SC, LC, or MPO—can make or break your network’s efficiency. In this head-to-head comparison, we analyze their size, port density, performance metrics, and ideal use cases, backed by data charts to simplify decision-making.
SC Connector
Size: Uses a 2.5mm ferrule, making it bulkier than LC.
Density: Occupies more rack space—ideal for legacy systems like telecom or CATV.
LC Connector
Size: Compact 1.25mm ferrule, 50% smaller than SC.
Density: Doubles port capacity in panels (e.g., 48 ports/U vs. SC’s 24 ports/U).
MPO Connector
Size: Multi-fiber design (12–72 fibers in one connector).
Density: Supports up to 144 fibers in a 1U space (e.g., 12x MPO-12 cassettes).
Insertion Loss
SC: 0.25–0.5 dB (higher due to larger ferrule alignment challenges).
LC: 0.1–0.3 dB (superior precision with smaller ferrule).
MPO: 0.2–0.5 dB (loss varies with fiber count and alignment).
Durability
SC/LC: 500–1,000 mating cycles (ceramic ferrule).
MPO: 500 cycles (complex multi-fiber alignment reduces longevity).
SC Connector
Best For:
Why: Robust design suits outdoor/industrial environments.
LC Connector
Best For:
Why: Space-saving and low loss for 10/25/100G Ethernet.
MPO Connector
Best For:
Why: Streamlines multi-fiber cabling for breakout solutions.
SC: Lowest cost (2–2–5 per connector) but declining in new deployments.
LC: Mid-range (3–3–8) and dominant in 5G fronthaul.
MPO: Highest (15–15–50) but critical for 400ZR and cloud scalability.
Legacy Networks: SC for durability.
High-Speed Data Centers: LC for density and low loss.
Future-Proofing: MPO for 400G+ and AI/ML workloads.